LEED AP with Operations and Maintenance (O+M ) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the LEED AP with O+M Test. Utilize flashcards and multiple-choice questions with detailed hints and explanations. Excel in your upcoming examination!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What should a project team do to successfully implement innovative ideas for LEED credits?

  1. Submit documentation without pre-approval

  2. Seek formal pre-approval from USGBC by submitting a CIR

  3. Implement ideas without USGBC input

  4. Consult with other project teams for advice

The correct answer is: Seek formal pre-approval from USGBC by submitting a CIR

Seeking formal pre-approval from the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) by submitting a Credit Interpretation Request (CIR) is essential when a project team wants to implement innovative ideas that could qualify for LEED credits. This process allows the project team to gain clarity on how their innovative strategies align with LEED requirements and ensures that these ideas will be recognized in the project’s certification process. By submitting a CIR, the project team receives guidance directly from the USGBC, increasing the likelihood of their innovative solution being accepted. This proactive approach helps in navigating the complexities of LEED criteria, ensuring that innovative approaches are not only compliant but also strategically aligned with the objectives of the LEED rating system. This step is crucial for reducing the risks associated with implementing new strategies without proper endorsement. In contrast, submitting documentation without pre-approval or implementing ideas without USGBC input could lead to challenges during the certification process, as these approaches could result in non-compliance with LEED standards. Consulting with other project teams may provide valuable insights but does not replace the need for direct communication and validation from the USGBC regarding innovative credit proposals.